Guide to Florida Eminent Domain Law
Eminent Domain Process- Your Property Rights
- Challenging the Government
- Eminent Domain Definitions
- Getting Full Compensation
- Hiring an Eminent Domain Attorney
Previous Posts
- Eminent Domain Used to Preserve History
- Controversy Continues Over Using Eminent Domain to...
- California Eminent Domain Controversy over Foreclo...
- The Measure and Method for Determining Compensatio...
- The Nature of the Power of Eminent Domain
- Change in Shape of Your Property Entitles You to S...
- Florida Eminent Domain Bill Passes in the House
- What Is Eminent Domain?
- Florida Eminent Domain Laws
- Florida Land Use Eminent Domain Laws
Archives
- March 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- April 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
Florida Eminent Domain Blog | Gregory W. Stoner
The Florida Eminent Domain Law Firm, PA
Friday, November 5, 2010
New York Appellate Court Considers Taking Property for Private Gain
In 2005, the US Supreme Court decided, in Kelo v. City of New London that eminent domain could be used to take property from one private owner and transfer it to another private owner if the second owner would use the land in such a way that would result in a net gain for the community. Many complained that this decision essentially gave local governments the right to steal from the poor and give to the rich, all in the name of correcting urban blight. In response, many states, including Florida, enacted laws protecting private property from eminent domain that would transfer the property to another private owner and limiting the use of eminent domain to correct urban blight. But not all states enacted such protections, and one state that did not is New York, where we are seeing another example of attempted abuse of eminent domain.
The case is Goldstein v. New York State Urban Development Corporation, in which residential and commercial property in the Atlantic Yards area of Brooklyn is being taken and given to Forest City Ratner Companies. The Atlantic Yards development will include an arena for the New Jersey Nets basketball team (owned by Bruce Ratner, the principal of Forest City Ratner); office, retail, and residential space; community facilities for health care and child care, and eight acres of open space for public use. The New York State Urban Development Corporation, doing business as the Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC), granted the use of eminent domain in 2006, claiming the project served the public benefits of eliminating blight, providing facilities, improving mass transit and infrastructure, increasing tax revenue, providing affordable housing, and creating jobs.
The property owners affected by the taking initially made a challenge in federal court, claiming that the primary benefits of the project would go to Ratner, with only incidental benefits going to the public, but in the wake of Kelo, federal courts denied the claim. Property owners then took their fight to the state courts, claiming that "public use" should be taken to mean a use where the property "is to be held open for use by all members of the public." In an initial decision, this interpretation was rejected because "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use . . . was abandoned long before [Kelo]."
The project, which is expected to significantly profit Ratner, already worth over $400 million, shows how hard it can be to protect property against private land grabs in lieu of specific legislation like what we have in Florida. If your land is threatened by an eminent domain action that you think is more likely to benefit private developers than the public good, The Florida Property Rights Law Firm, PA can help. Please contact us today to learn more.
posted by Admin at 2:58 PM
0 comments
